Prominent Jewish Figures Warn About the Perils of Weaponizing Identity
Muslim Leader Concurs: “Overcoming White Supremacism, Antisemitism and Islamist Extremism Will Require Courage, Honesty and Compassion”
Saint Sebastian’s Church in Columbo, Sri Lanka following an attack on April 21, 2019
In the weeks following white supremacist Brenton Tarrant’s live-streaming of his brutal slaughter of Muslims at prayer in New Zealand, Jews, Muslims and Christians have all fallen victim to shocking acts of terror. In response to these tragedies, a number of prominent Jewish figures have joined Kyai Haji Yahya Cholil Staquf—General Secretary of Indonesia’s Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), the world’s largest Muslim organization—in urging religious, cultural and political elites to end the practice of weaponizing identity, which exacerbates communal hatred and short-circuits analysis of the complex phenomena that contribute to ethnic and religious violence.
“Solidarity across racial, religious, cultural and political lines to address this global crisis is the only answer,” says Mr. Staquf. “The cycle of mutual recrimination and bloodshed we are witnessing is deeply rooted in history, including ancient animosities and ‘tribal narratives’ embedded within the collective memory of entire ethnic and religious groups. We must understand what fuels these hatreds, which extremists seek to awaken through heinous acts of terror, such as those which occurred recently in New Zealand, Sri Lanka, America, Nigeria and Burkina Faso.”
Mr. Staquf’s observation is borne out by the example of John Earnest, who on April 27, 2019—six weeks after Brenton Tarrant committed his atrocity against Muslims in Christchurch—attacked a synagogue in Poway, California, citing Tarrant as his inspiration and explicitly referencing Christian scripture as part of his justification for murdering Jews. A number of publications honed in on this fact, including the Washington Post. In a piece titled “The alleged synagogue shooter was a churchgoer who talked Christian theology, raising tough questions for evangelical pastors,” the article examined how Calvinist theology, mixed with white supremacist beliefs, motivated Earnest in his targeting of both Jews and Muslims, and how ministers of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church in America are responding to this disturbing reality.
The attack in Poway came less than five months after white supremacist Robert Bowers massacred eleven Jews at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, while in recent years, Jewish communities in Europe have endured similar horrific attacks at the hands of Muslim extremists, including the murder of young schoolchildren in Toulouse and an elderly Holocaust survivor in Paris. These tragedies illustrate the perils of weaponizing identity.
The bodies of the Toulouse Jewish school shooting victims, shrouded in prayer shawls, prior to burial at the Givat Shaul cemetery in Jerusalem, March 2012 (Photo credit: Uri Lenz/Flash90)
As the 2018 Nusantara Manifesto states: “In the Western world, Islamist terrorism—and, in the case of Europe, the influx of refugees and migrants from the broader Middle East and Africa—have significantly contributed to a profound polarization that threatens the integrity of those societies’ democratic systems. On both the political left and right, attitudes towards Islam have become a proxy battleground in a wider struggle for power that politicizes Islam and renders Muslims highly vulnerable to any breakdown in political order.”
“We believe that Muslims and non-Muslims should have equal rights as citizens in modern nation states, subject neither to preferential nor discriminatory treatment,” says Mr. Staquf. “It is extremely short-sighted, and indeed highly dangerous—not only for Muslim immigrants living in the West, but for their host communities as well—to permit Islamist extremists to form an ‘alliance of convenience’ with one end of the political spectrum to vilify and attack their opponents, and thereby exacerbate the intense polarization that is roiling Europe and North America. The entire world is at risk if we fail to summon the courage, honesty and compassion required to transcend our past grievances and embrace one another as fellow human beings, regardless of race, ethnicity or religion.
“This is why we call upon people of goodwill of every faith and nation to join in building a global consensus to prevent the political weaponization of Islam, whether by Muslims or non-Muslims, and to curtail the spread of communal hatred by fostering the emergence of a truly just and harmonious world order, founded upon respect for the equal rights and dignity of every human being.”
The world’s oldest Jewish newspaper
Writing in The Jewish Chronicle, public intellectual, journalist and commentator Melanie Phillips argued that the “Jewish community is making an unwitting contribution” to lethal ethnic and religious hatred:
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) provides an invaluable service translating material from Arabic into English and thus lifting the curtain on the deranged antisemitism coursing through the Arab and Muslim world.
Recently its founder, Yigal Carmon, observed that this Jew-hatred had spread to America and Europe where it was turning into “really violent threats based on Islamic texts.”
“And yet,” he added, the American Jewish community targeted by such attacks was silent. “Not a protest, no public activity, nothing at all. They are afraid to be thought of as Islamophobic”. . .
Worse still, people on the left are now smearing all anti-Islamists by lumping them together with white supremacists under the labels of “far right,” “alt-right” and “Islamophobes.”
After the New Zealand mosques massacre a stupendously brave Muslim leader, Yahya Cholil Staquf, wrote: “It is factually incorrect and counter-productive to define Islamophobia as ‘rooted in racism’. In reality, it is the spread of Islamist extremism and terror that primarily contributes to the rise of Islamophobia throughout the non-Muslim world.”
Furthermore, the antisemitism of the left is being fuelled by the antisemitism of the Muslim world — which is in turn emboldened and incentivised by the refusal of the non-Muslim world to condemn it.
These are the vicious and lethal circles to which the silence of the Jewish community is making an unwitting contribution.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and historian Dr. Harold Brackman called on all religious communities to have the “courage and clarity” to acknowledge and address supremacist hatred, whatever form it may take:
Tarrant is an Islamophobe who proudly calls himself in his deranged manifesto “an ecofascist”; who also lauded Dylan Roof for slaughtering innocent African American Christian worshippers in Charleston; who hopes that his mass murder will provoke a race war in the US.
Muslims and Jews must unite with Christians against the hydra-headed threat posed by global hate and terrorism against minorities around the world, personified by Tarrant. This threat is hydra-headed for Muslim and Jewish minorities because they are both targeted by the same white supremacists seeking to reestablish a world order where non-Christians and nonwhites were barely tolerated as second-class citizens.
Tarrant’s greatest nightmare was pluralism and tolerance in democratic lands like the U.S. and New Zealand. It is the wrong answer to criminalize reading Tarrant’s hate manifesto. You don’t defeat Nazism by banning Mein Kampf. It is also a mistake for one religious minority in our countries to demonize another son of Abraham.
And we won’t defeat burgeoning hate by embracing soothing but dishonest political correctness. Just days after the New Zealand attack, a Turkish-born terrorist in the Netherlands murdered and maimed new victims.
Muslims, Jews, and Christians should take their cue from Yahya Cholil Staquf, General Secretary of Nahdlatul Ulama, the world’s largest Islamic organization based in Indonesia. He wrote in London’s Telegraph how Muslim extremists exploit outworn religious supremacist doctrines going back to the medieval Caliphate to justify twenty-first century violence, just as Brenton Tarrant used the medieval Christian Crusades to justify his anti-Muslim atrocity. Both use the internet and social media to promote an age-old cycle of religious violence.
Moderates have to find the moral courage to speak out when their own religions are hijacked by extremists, just as Mr. Staquf has. When his courage and clarity become the norm we may have the chance to slay the dragon of hate.
Few European politicians know that the world’s largest Muslim organization is a moderate one.
by Manfred Gerstenfeld, January 12, 2019
A general view shows the Sehitlik Mosque in Berlin, Germany, November 28, 2018.
(Photo credit: REUTERS/FABRIZIO BENSCH)
The mass migration of Muslims into Europe with little selection has brought with it many problems. No influential Muslim groups have emerged that regularly speak out against the misbehavior of extremists of their faith. In the past there was the hope that in the course of time, a European Islam integrated in democracy would emerge. The prominent Muslim academic Bassam Tibi, originally from Syria, has promoted the idea of a European Islam for a quarter-century. In 2016 he gave up on this. He explained the reasons in an article in German whose title translates as “Why I capitulate.”
Few European politicians know that the world’s largest Muslim organization is a moderate one. The Indonesian Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) has more than 45 million members and tens of millions of additional sympathizers. Its secretary-general, Kyai Haji Yahya Cholil Staquf, in a 2017 interview with the German daily Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung, said Western politicians should stop saying extremism and terrorism have nothing to do with orthodox Islam.
Staquf added that contemporary Islamism is rooted in certain obsolete and problematic elements of Islamic orthodoxy. He heavily criticized Western political and intellectual elites who claim that Islam is inherently peaceful. He remarked that by analyzing Muslim scholarship, one understands that Muslims who in Western media are called Islamists and terrorists are the elite of political Islam. These so-called Islamists often know Islamic jurisprudence much better than the majority of Muslims. They interpret literally and act upon passages from the Qur’an and sayings attributed to the prophet Mohammed which enjoin violence against non-Muslims.
Staquf furthermore observed that the leadership of extremist mosques often incite hatred and violence towards non-believers. Some even encourage ‘martyrdom’ (suicide bombing) operations—a particularly dangerous form of incitement, given the revered status of a martyr within Islamic teachings. The West, Staquf added, should stop claiming that discussing these issues is Islamophobia. He remarked: “I am a Muslim scholar. Does anyone want to call me an Islamophobe?”
Staquf contrasted the moderate majority of Indonesian Muslims with the violent, but legitimate, currents of Islam the Western world is increasingly confronted with. He said moderate Indonesian Muslims are of the opinion that certain traditions from the Middle Ages have to be seen in the context of the time in which they originated, not as operational instructions for our times, and that national laws take precedence over Islamic laws.
Had all this been said by a Muslim scholar in Europe, it would not have had much relevance. This, however, is a leader who represents an organization with far more members than there are Muslims in the European Union. Staquf, an adviser to Indonesian President Joko Widodo, affirmed his comments in a lengthy dinner conversation during a visit to Jerusalem more than half a year ago.
Several European governments recognize the extreme need for influential Muslim organizations that will stand up against religious extremists in their countries. One idea was that courses to train imams at European universities should be established. In this way, it was thought, a new type of moderate imam would emerge. This poses not only a problem of legitimacy in European Muslim circles, but there is also the threat of such imams being intimidated by fanatics.
It would have been logical for Western governments to have looked for contacts with major moderate Muslim organizations abroad and incentivize them to set up representations in their countries. A recent visitor to Germany who met with senior officials in ministries told me, however, that ministry officials knew nothing or next to nothing about the NU.
Trying to promote and support a representation of NU in Germany should have been a priority, as it has a consolidated view of what moderate contemporary Islam should be. Such an NU presence could be vocal and provide courses and literature, provided its security is assured. Even if the NU only served as a powerful focal point for Muslim moderates in the country, that would be a great gain.
This is not without challenges, because Muslims have traditionally looked for new concepts primarily in the Middle East and, to some extent, in Pakistan. With sufficient government support, this handicap could probably be overcome. In today’s German reality, after its misconceived immigration policy in recent years, the authorities have nothing to lose.
Such an approach could also help to improve relations between Muslims and Jews. The only Indonesian president who visited Israel – and did so a number of times – was Kyai Haji Abdurrahman Wahid, chairman of the NU executive board from 1984 to 1999 and president of Indonesia from 1999 to 2001. American businessman C. Holland Taylor, a friend of both President Wahid and Staquf, mentions that Wahid cosponsored the 2007 Bali Holocaust Conference with the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He studied Kabbalah when he worked with an Iraqi Jew in Baghdad during the 1960s.
During his first week in office as president, Wahid publicly called for establishing diplomatic relations with Israel. Taylor quotes him as saying, “Indonesia has diplomatic relations with China, a communist and thus atheist country, why shouldn’t we have normal relations with Israel, whose people and government believe in God as we do?” Taylor remarks that today, a large part of the NU and its related political party PKB accept Wahid’s attitude toward Israel.
Establishing NU representation in Europe, particularly in Germany, could make a significant contribution to counteracting the ongoing excesses of Muslim extremists in the public domain.
The writer is emeritus chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He was given the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Journal for the Study of Antisemitism, and the International Leadership Award by the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
Download a PDF version of “Can Indonesians Help Moderate Islam in Europe?”
Share this communiqué via
Download a PDF copy of this communiqué (minus images).
You may also wish to read:
Don’t weaponize the term Islamophobia
World’s Largest Muslim Organization Promotes European Unity
Nobel Peace Prize Nomination Recognizes the Contribution of Indonesian Islam to Peace and Democracy